Conservatives roll out new ads

In the Conservatives quest to gain impressions for their message in the news — paired complimentarily to the media’s quest to sell newspapers and television advertising — new election-style ads are out from the party.

The Conservatives are explaining themselves saying that while they are focused on governing, if Michael Ignatieff is going to loudly and shamelessly beat the election drum, they have no choice but to respond.

When partisans release YouTube videos, the media doesn’t particularly notice. When there’s a party tagline on YouTube videos, the media sits up and wonders if these ads are going fill the gaps between stories of fake news Stephen Colbert mentioning Canada’s name thus meriting mention on the real news (CTV only) and stories of a reporter retiring (CBC only). Yes, will television networks merely repeat the ads as earned media in their newscasts or will they see the party buy some paid media?

I suppose the question will be answered if there’s an actual election. For the most part, these YouTube vignettes are election-ready. We have the full slate: the positive ad, the varied attack ads vs Ignatieff and the region-targeted ads about Jack Layton that will run in BC, and in rural Ontario, Saskatchwan and Manitoba markets. In French, there’s the ad against Gilles Duceppe being too “Montreal” (another cosmopolitan in our midst?!) and one that delightfully uses the wisdom of Justin Trudeau against Ignatieff. Interestingly, we also see the theme of illegal (cladestine?) immigration come up in French where unbeknown to many, polls higher as an issue in Quebec.

The move is a wise one for the Conservatives. The earned media juice will be worth the squeeze, and if we end up in election mode in a matter of weeks, the ads are already in the can. Also benefiting the Tories, it further underscores Ignatieff’s stated desire for an election. Speaking with senior Liberals last week, I can confirm that staffers are eager to clear the air and want the same. Canadians tend to punish those who are unnecessarily reckless in wanting power.

If you want to get a sense of the message of the top two parties going into the next election, the rhetoric of late has helped this become clear. The Conservatives argue that they’ve put Canada on the right track economically but the work isn’t finished yet. Also, leadership is a quality they want to emphasize. Further to this, they describe Michael Ignatieff as a charlatan who is only in it for himself, who is wrong on the economy and taxes and who would recklessly threaten the country’s stability with a coalition with socialists and separatists. The Conservatives will emphasize the fact the economy is on the recovery but that it is a fragile one. They will put the positive elements of the recovery in the window while Liberals will amplify their message against spending on “fighter jets and prisons”. For the Liberals, their response has been overconfidently focus-tested in the media and on twitter (fake lakes anyone?) and they’ll argue that the Conservatives have misplaced spending priorities when according to the Grits, the government should be spending on big ticket domestic items like national daycare and national eldercare.

Is there an election in the air, or is Michael Ignatieff simply doing his best to try to pass the task of supporting the government on the budget to Jack Layton? At the very least, the Conservatives are doing their best to prevent Ignatieff from skating through this effort easily. If being bellicose on an election helps Ignatieff save face, the Tories are doing their best to suggest that a coming election (and the uncertain time up to one) is Michael Ignatieff’s fault.

UPDATE: The ad buy is real. This is not just a YouTube campaign. Track the #SawAnAd hashtag for details.

Here are the ads:

The positive one:

The coalition one:

The Ignatieff’s weak connection to Canada ad:

The Ignatieff’s strong connection to America ad:

The NDP specific ad:

The Liberals vs. Liberals ad:

The Bloc specific ad:

Michael Ignatieff goes on tour

They’re calling in the “bus drive in the snow”.

Michael Ignatieff’s first stop: Carlingwood Mall. Perhaps the sleepiest mall in Ottawa.

There were some protesters outside (University of Ottawa and Carleton students):

Inside, Michael Ignatieff said that he was going to retire John Baird, who Ignatieff labeled the “snarling face” of Stephen Harper’s government. Ignatieff went on to say that Canadians have a choice between the red door and the blue door and that his bus tour may go on for ten more days or “even longer” (hinting at a coming election)

This Liberal rhetoric projects in the same direction, if not the same tone as that of the Liberal Party over the past 1.5 years. Ignatieff famously declared then that “Mr. Harper, your time is up!” indicating that his party would no longer support the Conservative government after a weak summer and climbdown over EI reform (“blue ribbon committee” anyone?) The bold tone of Ignatieff’s statement sent reporters into a tizzy declaring that an election was imminent. Canadians ended up punishing the Liberals as they reflected reservations (rightly or wrongly) of Ignatieff’s perceived newfound hunger for power at any cost. In my opinion, he was just trying to pass the bag to Layton’s NDP because the Liberal leader was tired of carrying it.

Lately, Ignatieff’s actions have followed a similar tack which some senior Conservatives describe as “flailing”. Indeed, Mr. Ignatieff is flailing if only to flail for enough breathing room to establish his party as the one that opposes the government in the House of Commons. Prior to the Christmas break, Ignatieff said that Liberals were ready for election at any time and he voiced a bellicose, reputation-staking tone on Calgary Centre North as a byelection to win (the riding is a safe seat for the Conservatives). Is this an opposition leader seeking an election or one trying to put the onus of supporting the upcoming budget on the NDP? I believe it is the latter and I’ll be watching for a kernel (on pensions?) that the government offers the NDP in exchange for Layton’s support. This certainly isn’t about an election as the Liberals have suffered in the polls and Canadians are still focused upon the economic recovery — an issue on which the voters place their trust in Stephen Harper.

Ignatieff’s false electioneering is a move to give way to Jack Layton so that the Liberal leader can safely oppose the government. This latest Liberal tour is a bus drive in the snow, so that Ignatieff can avoid the walk for the time being.

Liberals vs. Liberals

Today, the Prime Minister stated that more Canadians are working today than before the global economic crisis hit.

Dalton McGuinty’s Chief of Staff on Twitter:

Did you know Ontario has recovered 96% of the jobs lost during the recession? It’s true, and shows the plan is working.

From Global Toronto:

The NDP would scrap $850 million a year in planned corporate tax cuts of $1.4 billion this year and $1.8 billion next year to offset the lost HST revenue, said Leader Andrea Horwath.

“The HST is simply a shifting of tax burden off the corporate sector onto the backs of individuals,” she said.

“We would claw back the corporate tax cuts the government has implemented and cancel the future ones.”

Scrapping such a big slice of corporate tax cuts would hurt the fragile economic recovery by raising taxes on the struggling forestry and automotive sectors, warned Finance Minister Dwight Duncan.

“It is about the most short-sighted, dumb public policy pronouncement one can envision,” said Duncan.

Dwight Duncan is the Ontario Finance Minister.

Meanwhile Michael Ignatieff suggests freezing corporate tax cuts. And Scott Brison is none too pleased about the Conservative record and believes that the federal Liberals can do better.

UPDATE: David Akin asks the question,

Alright, I admit it. When a journalist asked Liberal Finance Critic Scott Brison a devastatingly worded question there was no way to answer safely, I smiled.

Here’s the question put by Sun Media’s David Akin:

“The Liberal finance minister in Ontario was asked this week about corporate tax cuts, his program. The NDP there would like tax cuts to be cancelled and his response was, and I’m quoting now, ‘It is about the most short-sighted, dumb public policy pronouncement one can envision to cancel corporate tax cuts,’ and I wondered if he knows something you don’t.”

Frankly, any honest reporter would admit there is great pleasure in seeing a politician squirm because of your question. Upon hearing the question, Brison did squirm. Then his response went from refusing comment to repeating his line that the previous Liberal government in Ottawa cut corporate taxes when the government was in surplus and he called on the current Conservative crowd to adopt that same policy and cancel the cuts scheduled to go into effect next year. All in all, Brison made the best of a situation he couldn’t win. When your provincial cousins call your policy “short-sighted” and “dumb” what possible response can you give? Something tells me there were probably some interesting calls between Parliament Hill and Queen’s Park not long after Brison’s news conference.