Stephen Harper’s speech

Brian Mulroney introduced Harper via video (he’s recovering from lung surgery).

Harper’s speech was very well written and kudos are in order for his speechwriter(s). I’ve been told that Harper writes many of his own speeches, so if this is true, he represents an oratory double-threat (he can write it and he can speak it).

He also brought it. The text and delivery had numerous hallmarks of a great speech. The use of contrast, the rule of three and the use of audience participation to reinforce and legitimize the message all contributed to make for an incredible speech.

“Promise made, promise broken” was said in unison by about 2,900 (delegates) and hundreds of observers. The outlining of Liberal silliness and broken promises one-by-one was quite effective as the line was repeated after each and every broken Liberal promise.

“They [the Liberals] promise to help us raise our children”,

Harper remarked and paused as we, the audience, erupted in laughter and then he joined with us laughing.

“So they’re creating a bureaucratic daycare program so expensive that young couples won’t be able to afford children”

“Promise made. Promise broken”

and so it went…

and then this:

“As prime minister, I will bring forward legislation that, while providing the same rights, benefits and obligations to all couples, will maintain the traditional definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman.”

“And, while I’m at it, I will tell you that, as prime minister, I will not bring forth legislation on the issue of abortion.”

Bye-bye hidden agenda. That loud thud was the collective thud of Liberal strategists losing consciousness. Finally, an explicit declaration of Harper’s position on abortion. I didn’t expect it.

He continued…

“And I will tell you this. That, as your leader, if you disagree with me on these matters, I will not call you stupid or label you a threat to Canadian values.”

“As leader, I care less about your views on these matters than whether you are prepared to respect the views of those who disagree with you.”

“And that’s why I will always allow all of your MPs to vote freely on matters of conscience.”

I believe that Harper struck an appropriate balance between respect for people’s polarized opinions and respect for the rights and liberties of Canadians. The status quo was maintained concerning rights on marriage and abortion plus he offered an extension of equal rights with married couples to gay unions.

Inclusive, respectful and electable.

Harper then continued to outline his plan for government and delivered it as if the writ could be dropped tomorrow. He pumped up the crowd and ended the speech with a lot of energy.

And on that… delegates exited the hall to vote for national council and on Stephen Harper’s leadership.

[Text of speech]

My friend Peter and I made our way towards the stage as the delegates filed out. A crowd had surrounded Preston Manning and Peter lined up to meet him. I chatted with MP Diane Ablonsky while the people in the small crowd otherwise tried to get a few words in with Preston. Then I chatted with Peter Mackay and thanked him for getting me involved during our chat at Ottawa’s Terry Fox run. We also talked about riding equality in order to build the party across Canada and received his encouragement for the formation of a youth wing for the party. I then received a text message from fellow Blogging Tory Lanny Cardow because they needed help upstairs scrutinizing the Harper confidence vote.

As an non-voting observer I met up with Lanny to see what I could do to help out. I manned the Quebec ballot box for a while and delived my “separate your ballots and fold twice instructions” in English and French a number of times. Fun stuff.

Even better times were had at the leader’s cocktail reception and post-speech parties. Stay tuned.

Solberg, Taylor and other blogging Tories!

Slept in. (See previous post about hospitality suites before and… hey, I’m an observer and I don’t need to attend delegate votes at 8am).

Lunch time: cab it into the congress centre.

Pop into a policy debate concerning economic development and prosperity. Belinda Stonach spoke about stopping the export of water before it can be fully reviewed. Then the real debate gets started… on agriculture. Apparently supply management is a contentious issue between it protecting against explicit subsidies for farmers and a viable economic model.

(Caution: shameless self-promotion ahead)

A handful of people approached me to tell me that they’re fans of this site and of bloggingtories! I was happy to meet Luc from Hacks and Wonks and Aaron Lee Wudrick. Then I see the de facto blogging tory, Monte Solberg walking by. I entend my hand to introduce myself as he passes and I introduce myself. “Hi Monte, I’m Stephen Taylor, with Blogging Tories”. He replies enthusiastically “HEY! I read your blog all the time!” His voice changes from cheerful to concern, “Stephen, I do have one complaint… your site is great but you don’t update it enough”. I’m humbled and somewhat embarrassed. I give him the meager exuse about having a MSc. thesis in biochemistry to work on but then concede that Monte’s probably quite busy too with his day job. We continue to have a great conversation about the blogging experience and I extend a personal invition to blogging tories. We chat some more about Monte’s adventures in blogging and, in particular, the PMO and National Post reaction to his recent blogging controversy.

My conversation with Monte Solberg brings up a particular point that perhaps political bloggers should consider. We do not, by any means, represent ‘traditional’ media, in any form as bloggers. In my experience with the traditional media, and in particular with interviews and conversations, it becomes somewhat clear when one is ‘on the record’ and ‘off the record’. Bloggers are becoming ubiquitous; they could be your neighbour, your brother, sister, or your dentist. Since a blogger does not represent the traditional media and is generally untrained in media relations, the on and off the record courtesy becomes somewhat lost as bloggers are sometimes too eager to publish the minutia of their experiences without regard for what was perhaps intended to be a private conversation between two people.

Given, Solberg knows who I am as a blogger. However, nobody’s life is an open book, even that of politicians. Private conversations are just that and thus I should only report the conversation as it related to the blogging of politics. However, I will say that Monte’s is a veritable class act and, because of his blog, he is now the undisputed king of Canadian political geek chic.

The agriculture debate was much too interesting for me and I needed a breath of fresh air, so I left the room and met some other national candidates. Of course, this would include Mr. Whatittakestowin Vi(c)tor Marciano. Vitor’s an animated guy and very intent on becoming one of the national councillors from Alberta. The policy debate on agriculture wraps up and supply management was accepted as part of the party’s policy.

Stephen Harper’s speech is next.

Live blogging from the convention (sort of)

I arrived in Montreal yesterday for the convention registration and immediately bumped into a few people I knew from the leadership race and people with whom I went to school.

First impressions?

You can’t turn around without bumping into an MP or somebody running for national council. In fact, you couldn’t get away from any the campaign teams for the national council candidates.

One of the first people that I met yesterday was BC lower mainland MP James Moore, to whom I introduced myself. “Oh, hi Stephen. I read your website”.

Wow. Great start to a great day.

There was some sort of protest outside the hall with people dressed up with pigs but it looked small and somewhat silly. I would find out later that night that it led the CPC policy convention story on CTV news with Lloyd Robertson. Talk about taking things out of scope!

The opening ceremonies were similar to a pep rally and included great speeches from Rona Ambrose, Peter Mackay, and Rahim Jaffer, John Baird, and Nina Grewal. The most memorable line from the event came from Mackay: “We must never again let another party define who we are or what we stand for”.

Then the hospitality suites…

So, there are these people running for national council and they want the delegates to vote for them, so they rent out hospitality suites and bribe us all with alcohol. Life is good. Best suites of the night go to the Canadian Council for Israel and Jewish Advocacy group (free booze and great Kosher food) and Susan McCarther (free booze and more free booze). Least popular suite of the night: Lois Brown (cash bar).

It was a great night filled with meeting a lot of interesting people.

Convention sidenote: everybody here is connected through cellphones. People who are actually connected use Blackberrys.