Canadian blogger(s) to be charged

Adscam spokesman Francois Perreault has made a statement:

“Anyone who takes that information [from the American blog] and diffuses it is liable to be charged with contempt of court … Anybody who reproduces it is at risk”

I’ve been fairly careful not to ‘diffuse’ this information but to report on events outside of the secret testimony. I have read the secret testimony and perhaps it has influenced my opinion (as it should hopefully influence most voters) but I’ve never directly linked the American blog that shall not be named. Looks like our friend over at the Canadian version of the Drudge Report that also shall not be named will be charged with contempt-of-court today. I can’t even name this all-news Canadian website (although it seems to be down right now).

There are certain words of anger and of shock concerning this recent development that I will not attempt to convey at this time. This is a sad day for personal civil liberties in Canada.

I never understood this publication ban concerning its relevance to blogs. I doubt that it would be impossible to interview potential jurors and filter them based on their knowledge of even the existence of blogs.

Jane Taber just called

Jane: “Hello Stephen? This is Jane Taber from the Globe and Mail”

Me: “uh, hello Jane”

Yes, Ms. Hot and Not herself gave me a call just a few minutes ago asking about Blogging Tories, the Sponsorship Scandal, CQ, the Gomery Inquiry and the publication ban.

I made sure to go “off the record” on a few things given the fine legal line that this blog currently treads concerning the secret testimony given last week by Jean Brault. I’m not sure that I’ll be mentioned directly; it felt more like a research call than an interview (no quotes required).

Me: “Is this going to be in tomorrow’s paper?”

Jane: “Yes, probably.”

Me: “I hope that the RCMP doesn’t knock on my door tomorrow.”

Jane: “[laughs] Give me a shout if they do. That would be a great story.”

UPDATE: Taber’s article is here. As I expected, the call was indeed for research. I’m not quoted but I have to say that it’s very gratifying to help move this whole process forward. It’s good to see that Peter MacKay agrees that this whole publication ban is pretty much now moot.

Snap elections, government turnover and the bankruptcy of the Liberal brand

Now that we’ve all been given morsels of gossip (if not the truth, and nothing but the truth — the whole truth is still coming) from the Gomery inquiry, parliamentarians are speaking of confidence motions and snap election calls. However, is this merely the beginning of a radical shift on the Canadian political landscape?

The Liberal party will try to stop the bleeding of this recent ‘damning’ testimony from Jean Brault during the Gomery inquiry and will considering calling Canadians to the polls before we have all of the facts for evaluation. The Liberals can only hope to use the long passage of time, which would come with a majority government, to allow Canadians to forget this still developing monster of a scandal. However, at this time, the Liberals can only hope to win a minority. Given an election cycle of 35 days, the recently tempered policy foundations of the Conservative party and the current sentiment in Quebec surrounding the daily confessional of the Gomery inquiry, the Liberals stand a good chance of losing their tenuous grip on power.

Yet, one must question whether or not this signifies something even greater. Is the Liberal brand itself on the verge of electable bankruptcy? During the 2004 general election, given the limited awareness of the Canadian electorate to the details of the now apparent deep-running corruption of the Sponsorship Scandal, Prime Minister Paul Martin labeled his candidates “Team Martin” and decided to forego the Liberal brand during that election. Now, we are becoming aware of the sordid and symbiotic money laundering scheme between the Liberal Party of Canada, the Government of Canada and Montreal ad agencies. Mix in some organized crime (as reported by the New York Daily News on Nov 18, 2004) and you’ve got a powder keg that will decimate the Liberal brand in Quebec for decades.

CTV News parliamentary bureau chief Robert Fife speculated that given the lastest testimony, the Bloc could sweep Quebec. Quebeckers, it would seem, hate organized crime more than they hate Liberals. Now some might not even make that differentiation.

Will these connections to organized crime and revelations of kickbacks to all levels of the Liberal Party organization cause its membership, staff and members of Parliaments (of which many are indeed innocent) to question the personal value of retaining membership in this corrupt and criminal organization? It must have been difficult enough being a member of an organization without any principled direction concerning policy, but to learn now that this organization is actually criminal may be too high of a personal price for many.

Will Canadians then have any tolerance for companies that are even perceived to be Liberal friendly? Would these companies risk association with the Liberal party for fear that Canadians may parallel them with Montreal ad firms? Will the Liberal party become the new pariah of Canadian politics?

The Liberals can call their election, they can even win another minority government. Conservatives just want Canadians to get all of the facts and they will with time. When that time comes, the government will fall and the destruction of the Liberal brand will be complete.